[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] checkpoint-restart: naked patch
    On 11/19/2010 05:27 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
    > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
    >>> The paragon of absurdity is struct task_struct::did_exec .
    >> Yeah, then go and figure how to do that in a way which would be useful
    >> for other purposes too instead of trying to shove the whole
    >> checkpointer inside the kernel. It sure would be harder but hey
    >> that's the way it is.
    > System call for one bit? This is ridiculous.

    Why not just a flag in proc entry? It's a frigging single bit.

    > Doing execve(2) for userspace C/R is ridicoulous too (and likely
    > doesn't work).

    Really, whatever. Just keep doing what you're doing. Hey, if it
    makes you happy, it can't be too wrong.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-19 17:35    [W:0.027 / U:0.768 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site