[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] checkpoint-restart: naked patch
    On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
    >> The paragon of absurdity is struct task_struct::did_exec .
    > Yeah, then go and figure how to do that in a way which would be useful
    > for other purposes too instead of trying to shove the whole
    > checkpointer inside the kernel.  It sure would be harder but hey
    > that's the way it is.

    System call for one bit? This is ridiculous.
    Doing execve(2) for userspace C/R is ridicoulous too (and likely doesn't work).
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-19 17:29    [W:0.021 / U:55.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site