Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:27:44 +0200 | Subject | Re: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] checkpoint-restart: naked patch | From | Alexey Dobriyan <> |
| |
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: >> The paragon of absurdity is struct task_struct::did_exec . > > Yeah, then go and figure how to do that in a way which would be useful > for other purposes too instead of trying to shove the whole > checkpointer inside the kernel. It sure would be harder but hey > that's the way it is.
System call for one bit? This is ridiculous. Doing execve(2) for userspace C/R is ridicoulous too (and likely doesn't work). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |