Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Generic hardware error reporting support | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:37:54 +0100 |
| |
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:28 +0800, huang ying wrote: > > > Instead you present your work as a fait accompli, not a work in flux and > > subject to change. You ask for it to be merged -- this does not come > > across like a discussion, much less a request for co-operation. > > I heard about that LKML likes talk with code instead of idea. Am I wrong?
No, its your presentation of said code that's wrong.
You're missing the [RFC] tags and open questions in your Changelogs like: EDAC could use it like so and so, does that sound acceptable Mauro?
There is no mention you actually did talk to Mauro and Tony and what its outcome was.
| |