[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation
    On 10-11-18 04:50 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
    > Before we go gung ho on this, there's no evidence that N discontiguous
    > ranges in one command are any better than the ranges sent N times ...
    > the same amount of erase overhead gets sent on SSDs.

    No, we do have evidence: execution time of the TRIM commands on the SSD.

    The one-range-at-a-time is incredibly slow compared to multiple ranges at a time.
    That slowness comes from somewhere, with about 99.9% certainty that it is due
    to the drive performing slow flash erase cycles.

    I think perhaps we should do the batching as much as possible,
    and then split them into single ranges for LLDs that cannot handle multi-ranges.

    Way more efficient that way.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-18 23:09    [W:0.021 / U:33.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site