Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] New utility: 'trace' | | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | | Date | Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:41:46 +0100 |
| |
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 15:37 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > The only reason why these filters might make sense is to reduce the > trace volume on system wide traces in production environments, but > that's a completely different story. These scenarios can do with the > dynamic tracepoint stuff and the custom filtering w/o putting the > burden on the majority of users.
I've been hearing people claim 'enterprise' and custom are like mutually exclusive ;-)
But yeah, I totally agree, I've never used any of that filter stuff either, I always script the post-processing.
|  |