[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] udf: Replace bkl with the inode->i_alloc_sem for protect udf_inode_info struct
    On Tue 16-11-10 13:05:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:40:47PM +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
    > > Replace bkl with the inode->i_alloc_sem rw semaphore in udf_release_file(),
    > > udf_symlink(), udf_symlink_filler(), udf_get_block() and udf_block_map().
    > > Add protection in udf_evict_inode() using the same i_alloc_sem rw semaphore.
    > I'd rather prefer not to introduce new users of i_alloc_sem. It's a
    > quite nasty beast: the only rw_semaphore that is not released by the
    > thread acquiring it. Thomas asked me if there's a way to get rid of it,
    > and I've come up with some schemes that I need to prototype. Adding
    > more uses that are unrelated to the original direct I/O use case are
    > not very helpful in doing that.
    OK, I didn't know this. It's no problem to replace i_alloc_sem with a
    private rw_semaphore so I can do that. I just thought we might as well use
    it when it's there and not waste more inode memory...

    Jan Kara <>
    SUSE Labs, CR

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-16 22:45    [W:0.018 / U:129.828 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site