[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v4] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Add Flow control/Fix Endianess issue/Separate IF register/Enumerate LEC macro/Move MSI processing/Use BIT(X)/Change Message Object index/Add prefix PCH_
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:43:25PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Wolfgang Grandegger <>
> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:39:47 +0100
> > Please take into account that this patch got accepted by accident
> > (because the maintainer did not respond properly in time). At that time
> > the driver was incomplete, not ready for mainline and did not even work
> > properly. Therefore it makes little sense to debug or even bisec these
> > changes. Just for that reason I made an exemption and added my
> > "Acked-by". Hope you can share my arguments.
> You don't put stupid on top of stupid and justify the latter using
> the former.

Is reverting the incomplete driver an option?

Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-16 22:11    [W:0.047 / U:3.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site