lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Remaining problems in firewire-net
On Nov 16 Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> The IP over 1394 tells that unicast can also use ISO transactions.
> However, it doesn't say how to negotiate the ISO channel number, thus a
> logical conclusion is that its not possible to use ISO transactions for
> unicast.
> Is that right?

To my understanding, any unicast transport method other than block write
to the unicast FIFO are outside the scope of RFC 2734. At the end of
section 7:
"""
Unicast IP datagrams whose quality of service is best-effort SHALL be
contained within the data payload of 1394 block write transactions [...]
"""
"""
Unicast IP datagrams that require quality of service other than
best-effort are beyond the scope of this standard.
"""
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =-== =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-16 16:15    [W:0.062 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site