Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:11:54 +0100 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: Remaining problems in firewire-net |
| |
On Nov 16 Maxim Levitsky wrote: > The IP over 1394 tells that unicast can also use ISO transactions. > However, it doesn't say how to negotiate the ISO channel number, thus a > logical conclusion is that its not possible to use ISO transactions for > unicast. > Is that right?
To my understanding, any unicast transport method other than block write to the unicast FIFO are outside the scope of RFC 2734. At the end of section 7: """ Unicast IP datagrams whose quality of service is best-effort SHALL be contained within the data payload of 1394 block write transactions [...] """ """ Unicast IP datagrams that require quality of service other than best-effort are beyond the scope of this standard. """ -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- =-== =---- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
| |