[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
<> wrote:
> [ ... ]
> This is quite unfortunate as I still have not seen the public comparison
> of the 2 implementations and the lists of benefits and shortfalls for
> both of them.

The reason why we are proposing SCST for upstream inclusion are:
- It has a large user base.
- The project is known for its high performance, low latency I/O and
excellent stability.
- A feature-wise overview can be found here:


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-15 18:57    [W:0.272 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site