[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 8/19]: SCST SYSFS interface implementation
    On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
    <> wrote:
    > [ ... ]
    > This is quite unfortunate as I still have not seen the public comparison
    > of the 2 implementations and the lists of benefits and shortfalls for
    > both of them.

    The reason why we are proposing SCST for upstream inclusion are:
    - It has a large user base.
    - The project is known for its high performance, low latency I/O and
    excellent stability.
    - A feature-wise overview can be found here:


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-15 18:57    [W:0.039 / U:3.536 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site