lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: fadvise DONTNEED implementation (or lack thereof)
    Date
    On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:09:29 +0900 (JST), KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
    > Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :)
    >
    Alright, fair enough. It still seems like there are many cases where
    fadvise seems more appropriate, but memcg should at least satisfy my
    personal needs so I'll shut up now. Thanks!

    - Ben


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-11-14 06:23    [W:0.020 / U:0.676 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site