[lkml]   [2010]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6 v6] ARM: Add basic architecture support for VIA/WonderMedia 85xx SoC's
> Russell, could you please elaborate on your comment regarding spinlocks
> and irq handlers? I always compile my kernel with all kinds of lock
> debugging, and have not run into any associated warnings. Is there
> anything suspicious specifically?

My fault: actually, those were not all lock debugging functions. It
really prints errors when lock correctness proving is enabled. I thus
decided to just assign the callback functions directly to irq_desc
struct fields, as it is done in mach-msm.

There is, however, another error showing up: it complains about my use
of ioremap inside arch_reset(). Is it fine to just hardcode the
virtual address of the respective register and use that directly in
this case? Something along the lines of:

/* PM Software Reset request register */
#define VT8500_PMSR_VIRT 0xf8130060

static inline void arch_reset(char mode, const char *cmd)
writel(1, VT8500_PMSR_VIRT);


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-11-12 21:17    [W:0.176 / U:2.768 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site