lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/18] fs: Introduce per-bucket inode hash locks
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 03:33:06AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:25PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> >
> > Protect the inod hash with a single lock is not scalable. Convert
>
> s/inod/inode/
>
> > p = &root->inode_tree.rb_node;
> > parent = NULL;
> >
> > - if (hlist_unhashed(&inode->i_hash))
> > + if (hlist_bl_unhashed(&inode->i_hash))
>
> Maybe introduce an inode_unhashed helper for this check which we're
> doing in quite a lot of places?

Ok, makes sense.

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-08 09:53    [W:1.663 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site