Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Nicolas Palix <> | Subject | [PATCH 4/6] Coccinelle: Use new comment format to explain kfree.cocci | Date | Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:27:39 +0200 |
| |
Use new comment format to separate proposed commit message and information about generated false positives
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Palix <npalix.work@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> --- scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci | 9 +++++---- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci index c13a539..f9f79d9 100644 --- a/scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ -/// Find a use after free. Values of variables may imply that some -/// execution paths are not possible, resulting in false positives. -/// Another source of false positives are macros such as -/// SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT_DEC that do not actually evaluate their argument +/// Find a use after free. +//# Values of variables may imply that some +//# execution paths are not possible, resulting in false positives. +//# Another source of false positives are macros such as +//# SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT_DEC that do not actually evaluate their argument /// // Confidence: Moderate // Copyright: (C) 2010 Nicolas Palix, DIKU. GPLv2. -- 1.7.0.4
| |