Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:58:10 +0200 | From | walter harms <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/14] drivers/net/sb1000.c: delete double assignment |
| |
Julia Lawall schrieb: > From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> > > The other code around these duplicated assignments initializes the 0 1 2 > and 3 elements of an array, so change the initialization of the > rx_session_id array to do the same. > > A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // <smpl> > @@ > expression i; > @@ > > *i = ...; > i = ...; > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> > > --- > This changes the semantics and has not been tested. > > drivers/net/sb1000.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/sb1000.c b/drivers/net/sb1000.c > index a9ae505..66c2f1a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/sb1000.c > +++ b/drivers/net/sb1000.c > @@ -961,9 +961,9 @@ sb1000_open(struct net_device *dev) > lp->rx_error_count = 0; > lp->rx_error_dpc_count = 0; > lp->rx_session_id[0] = 0x50; > - lp->rx_session_id[0] = 0x48; > - lp->rx_session_id[0] = 0x44; > - lp->rx_session_id[0] = 0x42; > + lp->rx_session_id[1] = 0x48; > + lp->rx_session_id[2] = 0x44; > + lp->rx_session_id[3] = 0x42; > lp->rx_frame_id[0] = 0; > lp->rx_frame_id[1] = 0; > lp->rx_frame_id[2] = 0; >
/me is surprised that this did not cause more problems. Is it needed at all ?
re, wh
| |