[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/21] fs: Protect inode->i_state with the inode->i_lock
    On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:37:05AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
    > One more note: IMO sb list lock is better off inside the hash one; when we
    > do per-chain hash locks, we'll be better off if we don't have to hold sb
    > one over the entire chain search.

    Why would you nest these two at all?

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-10-22 13:43    [W:0.017 / U:3.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site