[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/21] fs: Protect inode->i_state with the inode->i_lock
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:37:05AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> One more note: IMO sb list lock is better off inside the hash one; when we
> do per-chain hash locks, we'll be better off if we don't have to hold sb
> one over the entire chain search.

Why would you nest these two at all?

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-22 13:43    [W:0.205 / U:7.680 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site