Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:33:27 +0200 | | From | Jiri Slaby <> | | Subject | Re: + softirq-cleanup-preempt-check.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
On 10/09/2010 06:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > But I agree the line should be split, I however much prefer the form: > > static inline > void softirq_preempt_check(struct softirq_action *h, int prev_count)
Ok I can do that while I'm ratelimiting the message. When this error occurs, it floods the kmsg quite a lot for works like netif_rx.
thanks, -- js suse labs
|  |