lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] omap: add hwspinlock device
    On 10/20/2010 12:53 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
    > Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> writes:
    >
    >> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Hilman
    >> <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> wrote:
    >>>> +postcore_initcall(hwspinlocks_init);
    >>>
    >>> Any reason this needs to be a postcore_initcall? Are there users of
    >>> hwspinlocks this early in boot?
    >>
    >> i2c-omap, which is subsys_initcall (the I2C bus is shared between the
    >> A9 and the M3 on some OMAP4 boards).
    >
    > Rather than moving towards having more drivers have to be built in (and
    > depend on their probe order) we need to be moving towards building all
    > these drivers as modules, including omap-i2c.

    The issue of probe order still needs to be resolved for those of us who
    do want all the drivers built into the kernel. Everything comes out in
    the wash already if everything is built as modules by installing the
    modules in the correct order right?

    ~Ryan

    --
    Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

    Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
    ryan@bluewatersys.com PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
    http://www.bluewatersys.com New Zealand
    Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
    Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-10-20 03:23    [W:0.022 / U:0.384 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site