lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling
    From
    Date
    It should.

    "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

    > On 10/15/2010 05:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
    >> On 10/12/2010 01:29 PM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
    >>> Commit-ID: 77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
    >>> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
    >>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
    >>> AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:10 +0200
    >>> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
    >>> CommitDate: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:53:44 +0200
    >>>
    >>> x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling
    >>>
    >>> There seems to be more cleanups possible, but that's left to the xen
    >>> experts :)
    >> This causes the kernel to fail to boot under Xen. The WARN_ON(res !=
    >> irq) triggers and nobody is very happy about the results.
    >
    >Of course the really interesting question is whether this sparse irq
    >rework allows us to hang our extra per-irq information of the irq_data
    >structure now, rather than having to maintain all these auxiliary arrays?
    >
    >Thanks,
    > J

    --
    Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-10-16 04:05    [W:0.020 / U:0.420 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site