Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix transaction recovery in group_sched_in() | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:39:47 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 19:34 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > > > Yes, makes sense.. I'm a bit hesitant to slap a -stable tag on it due to > > its size,.. Ingo, Paulus? > > > I was worried about the size too but I could not figure out another > smaller way of doing this. An alternative would be to pass an > extra argument to the function and call it twice.
I think the current approach is fine, just being paranoid about unintentional breakage..
I guess we should cook it a while before offering it to -stable.
| |