[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] sched: drop group_capacity to 1 only if local group has extra capacity
    On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:13 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
    > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:05 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > > For regular balancing local_group will be the first, since we only
    > > ascend the domain tree on the local groups. But its not true for no_hz
    > > balancing afaikt.
    > Even for NOHZ, we always ascend each cpu's sched domain and the local
    > group is the first one always. But yes, we are depending on the local
    > group being the first group.

    Ah, yes, we take the balance_cpu's domain tree, not the local cpu's
    domain tee.

    Hrm,.. ok feels slightly tricky though.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-10-15 19:27    [W:0.021 / U:18.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site