lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] sdio: fix suspend/resume regression
Date
Fix SDIO suspend/resume regression introduced by
4c2ef25fe0b847d2ae818f74758ddb0be1c27d8e "mmc: fix all hangs related to
mmc/sd card insert/removal during suspend/resume":

[ 5647.295953] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 5647.318792] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
[ 5647.337048] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
[ 5647.356915] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
[ 5647.366651] pm_op(): platform_pm_suspend+0x0/0x5c returns -38
[ 5647.366671] PM: Device pxa2xx-mci.0 failed to suspend: error -38
[ 5647.367082] PM: Some devices failed to suspend

4c2ef25fe0b847d2ae818f74758ddb0be1c27d8e moved the card removal/insertion
mechanism out of MMC's suspend/resume path and into pm notifiers
(mmc_pm_notify), and that broke SDIO's expectation that mmc_suspend_host()
will remove the card, and squash the error, in case -ENOSYS is returned
from the bus suspend handler (mmc_sdio_suspend() in this case).

mmc_sdio_suspend() is using this whenever at least one of the card's SDIO
function drivers does not have suspend/resume handlers - in that case
it is agreed to force removal of the entire card.

This patch fixes this regression by trivially bringing back that part of
mmc_suspend_host(), which was removed by 4c2ef25fe0b847d2ae818f74758ddb0be1c27d8e.

Reported-and-tested-by: Sven Neumann <s.neumann@raumfeld.com>
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
--

It may still be desired to further clean this area up by using the card
removal mechanism in mmc_pm_notify() for SDIO as well.

To use mmc_pm_notify's card-removal code also for SDIO, we need it
to check if all the SDIO functions have suspend handlers. That
would probably make us add a new bus_ops handler (something like
host->bus_ops->remove_card_on_suspend ?).

It's starting to get a bit complicated though, and I'm not sure it
would make the code a lot more readable.

In addition, this would still not work for drivers like libertas sdio,
which do have a suspend handler, but sometimes let it return -ENOSYS,
expecting mmc_suspend_host() to remove the card and squash the error.
For those cases, we still need the old card-removal logic in mmc_suspend_host().

This brings up a question whether libertas_sdio really needs this
functionality; When MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER is not needed, can't it just return 0
(and as a result the card will be powered down, but not removed) ?

Until we have an agreement on this, I suggest we at least fix the
regression with this patch.

Thanks Sven Neumann for reporting and testing the issue and this patch.

drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index c94565d..515ff39 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1682,6 +1682,19 @@ int mmc_suspend_host(struct mmc_host *host)
if (host->bus_ops && !host->bus_dead) {
if (host->bus_ops->suspend)
err = host->bus_ops->suspend(host);
+ if (err == -ENOSYS || !host->bus_ops->resume) {
+ /*
+ * We simply "remove" the card in this case.
+ * It will be redetected on resume.
+ */
+ if (host->bus_ops->remove)
+ host->bus_ops->remove(host);
+ mmc_claim_host(host);
+ mmc_detach_bus(host);
+ mmc_release_host(host);
+ host->pm_flags = 0;
+ err = 0;
+ }
}
mmc_bus_put(host);

--
1.7.0.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-13 09:41    [W:0.088 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site