lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: aranym bug, manifests as "ida_remove called for id=13" on recent kernels
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> Mikael Pettersson dixit:
>
> >It's gcc PR41302 which was fixed for gcc trunk on November 4 2009
> >in r153890. The patch backports easily to gcc-4.4 and solves the
> >test case there (manual inspection using a cross). It also backports
>
> [x] send unidiff
>
> I’ll include that in my gcc build and then forward it to Debian
> once I got a working gcc, unless you want to push that to them
> already.

This is what I have had in my repo since November last year,
but it's only been minimally tested in a cross. Please push
if/once it passes bootstrap + regtest.

gcc/

2009-11-10 Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>

Backport from mainline:
2009-11-04 Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com>

PR target/41302
* config/m68k/m68k.c (m68k_reg_present_p): New static function.
(m68k_ok_for_sibcall_p): Handle different result return locations.

gcc/testsuite/

2009-11-10 Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>

Backport from mainline:
2009-11-04 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@codesourcery.com>

PR target/41302
* gcc.target/m68k/pr41302.c: New test.

--- gcc-4.4.2/gcc/config/m68k/m68k.c.~1~ 2008-11-19 17:24:10.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc-4.4.2/gcc/config/m68k/m68k.c 2009-11-10 00:10:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -1374,6 +1374,30 @@ flags_in_68881 (void)
return cc_status.flags & CC_IN_68881;
}

+/* Return true if PARALLEL contains register REGNO. */
+static bool
+m68k_reg_present_p (const_rtx parallel, unsigned int regno)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ if (REG_P (parallel) && REGNO (parallel) == regno)
+ return true;
+
+ if (GET_CODE (parallel) != PARALLEL)
+ return false;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (parallel, 0); ++i)
+ {
+ const_rtx x;
+
+ x = XEXP (XVECEXP (parallel, 0, i), 0);
+ if (REG_P (x) && REGNO (x) == regno)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/* Implement TARGET_FUNCTION_OK_FOR_SIBCALL_P. */

static bool
@@ -1386,6 +1410,26 @@ m68k_ok_for_sibcall_p (tree decl, tree e
if (CALL_EXPR_STATIC_CHAIN (exp))
return false;

+ if (!VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (DECL_RESULT (cfun->decl))))
+ {
+ /* Check that the return value locations are the same. For
+ example that we aren't returning a value from the sibling in
+ a D0 register but then need to transfer it to a A0 register. */
+ rtx cfun_value;
+ rtx call_value;
+
+ cfun_value = FUNCTION_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (DECL_RESULT (cfun->decl)),
+ cfun->decl);
+ call_value = FUNCTION_VALUE (TREE_TYPE (exp), decl);
+
+ /* Check that the values are equal or that the result the callee
+ function returns is superset of what the current function returns. */
+ if (!(rtx_equal_p (cfun_value, call_value)
+ || (REG_P (cfun_value)
+ && m68k_reg_present_p (call_value, REGNO (cfun_value)))))
+ return false;
+ }
+
kind = m68k_get_function_kind (current_function_decl);
if (kind == m68k_fk_normal_function)
/* We can always sibcall from a normal function, because it's
@@ -4583,6 +4627,9 @@ m68k_libcall_value (enum machine_mode mo
return gen_rtx_REG (mode, D0_REG);
}

+/* Location in which function value is returned.
+ NOTE: Due to differences in ABIs, don't call this function directly,
+ use FUNCTION_VALUE instead. */
rtx
m68k_function_value (const_tree valtype, const_tree func ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
--- gcc-4.4.2/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/m68k/pr41302.c.~1~ 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc-4.4.2/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/m68k/pr41302.c 2009-11-04 13:09:17.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "move.l \%d0,\%a0" { target *linux* } } } */
+
+struct pts {
+ int c;
+};
+
+unsigned int bar (struct pts *a, int b);
+
+struct pts * foo (struct pts *a, int b)
+{
+ return (struct pts *) bar (a, b);
+}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-10-11 21:07    [W:0.113 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site