Messages in this thread | | | From | Grant Likely <> | Date | Sun, 10 Oct 2010 00:02:06 -0600 | Subject | Re: Microblaze little-endian port + driver changes |
| |
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > here is the first bunch of patches which is necessary to apply > to get microblaze little-endian AXI version work. > > All patches are placed in microblaze-next branch and they are also > merged to linux-next branch. > > Grant: I would like to ask you if you can please take a look > at little-endian driver changes.
[cc'ing sfr re: pending linux-next merge conflict]
Hi Michal,
Can you please remove the following patches from your linux-next branch:
of: GPIO: Fix OF probing on little-endian systems of: MTD: Fix OF probing on little-endian systems of: Fix uart16550 initialization on little-endian systems
The emaclite patch can stay since it has a proper acked-by from both davem and I.
I had picked up all three, and then later replaced the of_serial patch with a better one. However, because it is also in your tree it will cause a linux-next conflict when Stephen tries to merge.
For device tree patches that touch code outside of arch/microblaze, I would like them to not show up in linux-next before I've acked them to avoid this exact problem. I don't have a problem with device tree patches going in via another tree, but I need to know about it so that I can keep things coordinated.
Stephen, when/if you see the conflict, please take the copy of of_serial.c from my tree.
Thanks, g.
| |