lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 6/6] x86: cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node

Hi David,

> Do we really want to do this? A nid of -1 is undefined, so the result of
> cpumask_of_node(-1) should be undefined; there's no formal definition that
> a nid of -1 follows the semantics that we use for x86 pci buses, for
> example, where it implies no NUMA locality in all cases.

I don't like the use of -1 as a node, but it's much more widespread than
x86; including sh, powerpc, sparc and the generic topology code. eg:


#fdef CONFIG_PCI
extern int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *pbus);
#else
static inline int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *pbus)
{
return -1;
}


It would be nice to get rid of this special case but I suspect that's not
2.6.33 material.

Speaking of invalid node ids, I also noticed the scheduler isn't using
node iterators:

for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) {

which should be fixed at some stage too since it doesn't allow us to
allocate the node structures sparsely.

Anton


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-07 00:43    [W:0.060 / U:3.004 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site