[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault()
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 09:17:11 -0600 (CST)
Christoph Lameter <> wrote:

> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > while I appreciate the goal of reducing contention on this lock...
> > wouldn't step one be to remove the page zeroing from under this
> > lock? that's by far (easily by 10x I would guess) the most
> > expensive thing that's done under the lock, and I would expect a
> > first order of contention reduction just by having the zeroing of a
> > page not done under the lock...
> The main issue is cacheline bouncing. mmap sem is a rw semaphore and
> only held for read during a fault.

depends on the workload; on a many-threads-java workload, you also get
it for write quite a bit (lots of malloc/frees in userspace in addition
to pagefaults).. at which point you do end up serializing on the

There's some real life real big workloads that show this pretty badly;
so far the workaround is to have glibc batch up a lot of the free()s..
but that's just pushing it a little further out.


Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-06 04:23    [W:0.131 / U:62.416 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site