[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    On 01/25/2010 06:17 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > On 01/26/2010 10:06 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    >> On 01/25/2010 07:22 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
    >>> In arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c, per_cpu(exception_stacks, cpu) is
    >>> replaced with &per_cpu(exception_stacks[0], cpu) which is equivalent
    >>> except that it allows per_cpu() macro to correctly drop percpu
    >>> designation during sparse pass.
    >> Same comment as Frederic's about this... this kind of uglification
    >> really is unacceptable and needs to be addressed.
    > Hmm... I don't think it's too bad but if you don't like it that much,
    > probably the right thing to do is just leave it there and let sparse
    > whine about it. There are only three in-kernel instances at this
    > point, so it's not that big a deal.

    That would probably be my preference until it can be fixed in a better
    way. If we paper it over now, it will be forgotten -- and then someone
    will come along and cargo cult it for no good reason.


    H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
    I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-02-01 04:38    [W:0.013 / U:43.860 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site