[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCHv3 2/2] powerpc: implement arch_scale_smt_power for Power7
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:24 -0600, Joel Schopp wrote:
>> On Power7 processors running in SMT4 mode with 2, 3, or 4 idle threads
>> there is performance benefit to idling the higher numbered threads in
>> the core.
>> This patch implements arch_scale_smt_power to dynamically update smt
>> thread power in these idle cases in order to prefer threads 0,1 over
>> threads 2,3 within a core.
> Almost there :-) Joel, Peter, can you help me figure something out tho ?
> On machine that don't have SMT, I would like to avoid calling
> arch_scale_smt_power() at all if possible (in addition to not compiling
> it in if SMT is not enabled in .config).
> Now, I must say I'm utterly confused by how the domains are setup and I
> haven't quite managed to sort it out... it looks to me that
> SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER is always going to be set on all CPUs when the config
> option is set (though each CPU will have its own domain) or am I
> misguided ? IE. Is there any sense in having at least a fast exit path
> out of arch_scale_smt_power() for non-SMT CPUs ?
> Joel, can you look at compiling it out when SMT is not set ? We don't
> want to bloat SMP kernels for 32-bit non-SMT embedded platforms.
I can wrap the powerpc definition of arch_scale_smt in an #ifdef, if
it's not there the scheduler uses the default, which is the same as it
uses if SMT isn't compiled.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-29 19:43    [W:0.088 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site