lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Staging:IIO: New ABI

> > > Nope. And I am also interested in this since I am sittign on a bunch of
> > > accelerometers, magnetometers, etc drivers that are trying to plug into
> > > input sysbsystem and quite unsure what to do with them.
> > >
> > > It was OK whch HDAPS and friends when they were using input for
> > > secondary, toyish purposes, but these new drivers trying to use input
> > > devnts as primary API and I am unsure if it is the best solution.
> > > Accelerometer might be used as an input device but not always an input
> > > device.
> >
> > Yeah, I see it using a joystick interface, which might be acceptable for
> > "toy" devices like you say.
> >
> > But for "real" ones, we should do something else.
> >
> > Maybe, for devices that are going to be used by x.org, like the "toy"
> > ones, we stick with the current input interface, but for others, we use
> > a "real" interface, probably through hwmon, so that users can get the
> > real data out in a consistant manner.
>
> I'd rather have all of them use real interface and then have a bridge
> to input module to enable toyish mode (unless the device in question
> is really truly an input device).

Well, if you look at the PDA class devices, they really use
magnetometers and accelerometers for input. I guess we should look at
better support in input...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-27 08:11    [W:0.074 / U:1.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site