Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:29:26 +0100 (CET) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [stable] [00/29] 2.6.32.6 stable review |
| |
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:11:45 -0800 Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.32.6 release. > > There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > > this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let > > us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants > > to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > > > > Responses should be made by Monday, January 24, 00:00:00 UTC. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > 2.6.32.6 will still contain the regression described in (for example) > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005 > > It's fixed with the below revert which has been in -mm (and only in > -mm) for ten days. > > I don't what's going on - perhaps we're waiting for Thomas, and he's > otherwise engaged. There's a fix in the lkml thread "Re: [RFC PATCH > 0/4] clockevents: fix clockevent_devices list corruption after cpu > hotplug" to which Thomas replied > > I just applied your patch, but kept the cpuweight check. This > is the least intrusive solution for now. The logic needs an > overhaul, but thats neither rc4 nor stable material"
Just sent the pull request for it. Sorry for the delay. The patch needs to go into 32.6 as well.
Thanks,
tglx
| |