Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:36:18 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:36:17 -0500
> [ Added Heiko Carstens and Paul Mundt to Cc ] > > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> also, does the arch_syscall_addr() even really need to be weak ? or can >> we assume that everyone is going to be sane and do it the same way ... >> >> Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt | 6 +++++- >> arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ---------- >> arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c | 9 --------- >> arch/sparc/kernel/ftrace.c | 11 ----------- >> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ---------- >> include/linux/ftrace.h | 6 ++++++ >> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 6 +++++ > > Actually for this patch to be accepted, we need to get the acks from the > maintainers of s390, sh, and sparc since it touches their code. Doesn't > matter if it is just removing duplicate code. Still need their acks.
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| |