lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations
From
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:36:17 -0500

> [ Added Heiko Carstens and Paul Mundt to Cc ]
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> also, does the arch_syscall_addr() even really need to be weak ? or can
>> we assume that everyone is going to be sane and do it the same way ...
>>
>> Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt | 6 +++++-
>> arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ----------
>> arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c | 9 ---------
>> arch/sparc/kernel/ftrace.c | 11 -----------
>> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ----------
>> include/linux/ftrace.h | 6 ++++++
>> kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 6 +++++
>
> Actually for this patch to be accepted, we need to get the acks from the
> maintainers of s390, sh, and sparc since it touches their code. Doesn't
> matter if it is just removing duplicate code. Still need their acks.

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-23 02:39    [W:0.123 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site