lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 04/12] Add "handle page fault" PV helper.
On 01/21/2010 01:02 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> You can also just emulate the state transition -- since you know
>> you're dealing with a flat protected-mode or long-mode OS (and just
>> make that a condition of enabling the feature) you don't have to deal
>> with all the strange combinations of directions that an unrestricted
>> x86 event can take. Since it's an exception, it is unconditional.
>
> Do you mean create the stack frame manually? I'd really like to avoid
> that for many reasons, one of which is performance (need to do all the
> virt-to-phys walks manually), the other is that we're certain to end up
> with something horribly underspecified. I'd really like to keep as
> close as possible to the hardware. For the alternative approach, see Xen.
>

I obviously didn't mean to do something which didn't look like a
hardware-delivered exception. That by itself provides a tight spec.
The performance issue is real, of course.

Obviously, the design of VT-x was before my time at Intel, so I'm not
familiar with why the tradeoffs that were done they way they were.

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-21 16:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans