[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP)
    On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:47:45AM -0800, Jim Keniston wrote:
    > > Do you have plans for a variant
    > > that's completely in userspace?
    > I don't know of any such plans, but I'd be interested to read more of
    > your thoughts here. As I understand it, you've suggested replacing the
    > probed instruction with a jump into an instrumentation vma (the XOL
    > area, or something similar). Masami has demonstrated -- through his
    > djprobes enhancement to kprobes -- that this can be done for many x86
    > instructions.
    > What does the code in the jumped-to vma do? Is the instrumentation code
    > that corresponds to the uprobe handlers encoded in an ad hoc .so?

    Once the instrumentation is requested by a process that is not the
    instrumented one, this looks impossible to set a uprobe without a
    minimal voluntary collaboration from the instrumented process
    (events sent through IPC or whatever). So that looks too limited,
    this is not anymore a true dynamic uprobe.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-01-19 19:09    [W:0.020 / U:10.940 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site