lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling (v5)
    On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:56:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 15:45 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
    > >
    > > > > That requires to know in advance if we have hardware pmu
    > > > > in the list though (can be a flag in the group).
    > > >
    > > > Good point, but your proposed hw_check_constraint() call needs to know
    > > > the exact same.
    > >
    > >
    > > True. Whatever model we use anyway, both implement the same idea.
    >
    > Hmm, we seem to already have that problem (which would indicate another
    > bug in the hw-breakpoint stuff), how do you deal with
    > hw_perf_{enable,disable}() for the breakpoints?


    We don't have ordering constraints for breakpoints, only constraints
    on the number of available registers.

    So we check the constraints when a breakpoint registers. The
    enable/disable then (is supposed to) always succeed on breakpoint
    pmu, except for flexible breakpoints that can make it or not,
    but no need to overwrite group scheduling for that.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-01-18 17:21    [W:0.020 / U:1.220 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site