lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3
Tejun Heo wrote:
> slow-work is probably the largest chunk which can be replaced by cmwq
> but as shown in the libata case small conversions can bring noticeable
> benefits and there are other places which have had to deal with
> similar limitations.

I for one as driver programmer am keen on cmwq. It would help me fix a
lack of parallelism in firewire (target probe/ reconnect/ removal in the
storage driver). I can implement what I have in mind with slow-work too
but cmwq would take less effort and LOC.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ---= =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-18 17:17    [W:0.709 / U:0.964 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site