Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:15:59 +0100 | From | Emese Revfy <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Constify struct sysfs_ops for v2.6.33-rc4 |
| |
Al Viro wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:25:37PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Emese Revfy wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> >>> Acked-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> >>> Acked-by: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> >>> Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@intel.com> >>> Acked-by: Hans J. Koch <hjk@linutronix.de> >>> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> >>> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> >>> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> >> NACKed-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> >> >> Same reason. > > BTW, commit 9905a43b2d563e6f89e4c63c4278ada03f2ebb14 > Author: Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com> > Date: Mon Dec 14 00:58:57 2009 +0100 > > backlight: Constify struct backlight_ops > > is also crap; again, same reason. Would you please get a clue and stop > pushing that particular bullshit into the tree?
The backlight maintainer accepted that patch before the discussion on field constification concluded. I drew his attention to the discussion (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/16/395) but he still accepted the patch as is. -- Emese
| |