[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: disablenetwork (v5): Require CAP_SETPCAP to enable
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Michael Stone <> wrote:
> Andrew Morgan wrote:
>> Please use CAP_NET_ADMIN for this feature (and add the corresponding
>> comment in include/linux/capabilities.h).
> Sure.
> However, to make sure I understand the purpose of the adjustment, would you
> mind saying a word or two about what considerations cause you to recommend
> CAP_NET_ADMIN instead of (or in addition to?) CAP_SETPCAP?

If you take a look at the capabilities.h file, you'll see that each of
the capabilities is preceded by an explanation of what privilege it

CAP_SETPCAP refers to privileged manipulation of capabilities
(permission to violate the normal capability rules) and nothing to do
with the network.

You are adding something akin to a per-process tree firewall setting -
deny/enable network access to this process. I think you'll agree that
the CAP_NET_ADMIN description is a much better match for this.



> Thanks for your feedback,
> Michael

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-17 06:01    [W:0.141 / U:5.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site