[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/24] MAINTAINERS: Document new "Q:" patchwork queue type
Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:02 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> The proposed entry type is somewhat redundant:
>> PS: Make sure that and are
>> mentioned in our process-related documentation, and you are done. No
>> need for more MAINTAINERS churn just for that.
> Many lists are not using patchwork.

All lists which do use patchwork are listed on and So, add a paragraph on them in
Documentation/HOWTO and you are done.

The listings at and are always
current. Your manual copy in the kernel source won't be.

See? I just saved you and others quite some time. You could spend it
for example to helpgetting our regressions count down.

> Micropatches to MAINTAINERS are preferred because of rate of change.

Useless micropatches do _not_ make one look productive.
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ---= -===-

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-01-14 19:07    [W:0.093 / U:10.396 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site