Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:56 +0100 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/24] MAINTAINERS: Document new "Q:" patchwork queue type |
| |
Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:02 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: >> Stefan Richter wrote: >>> The proposed entry type is somewhat redundant: >> PS: Make sure that patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org are >> mentioned in our process-related documentation, and you are done. No >> need for more MAINTAINERS churn just for that. > > Many lists are not using patchwork.
All lists which do use patchwork are listed on patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org. So, add a paragraph on them in Documentation/HOWTO and you are done.
The listings at patchwork.kernel.org and patchwork.ozlabs.org are always current. Your manual copy in the kernel source won't be.
See? I just saved you and others quite some time. You could spend it for example to helpgetting our regressions count down.
> Micropatches to MAINTAINERS are preferred because of rate of change.
Useless micropatches do _not_ make one look productive. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- ---= -===- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
| |