[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/24] MAINTAINERS: Document new "Q:" patchwork queue type
    Joe Perches wrote:
    > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:02 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
    >> Stefan Richter wrote:
    >>> The proposed entry type is somewhat redundant:
    >> PS: Make sure that and are
    >> mentioned in our process-related documentation, and you are done. No
    >> need for more MAINTAINERS churn just for that.
    > Many lists are not using patchwork.

    All lists which do use patchwork are listed on and So, add a paragraph on them in
    Documentation/HOWTO and you are done.

    The listings at and are always
    current. Your manual copy in the kernel source won't be.

    See? I just saved you and others quite some time. You could spend it
    for example to helpgetting our regressions count down.

    > Micropatches to MAINTAINERS are preferred because of rate of change.

    Useless micropatches do _not_ make one look productive.
    Stefan Richter
    -=====-==-=- ---= -===-

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-01-14 19:07    [W:0.033 / U:1.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site