[lkml]   [2010]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RESEND][mmotm][PATCH v2, 0/5] elf coredump: Add extended numbering support
    From: Andrew Morton <>
    Subject: Re: [RESEND][mmotm][PATCH v2, 0/5] elf coredump: Add extended numbering support
    Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:29:28 -0800

    > On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:06:07 +0900 (JST)
    > Daisuke HATAYAMA <> wrote:
    > > The current ELF dumper can produce broken corefiles if program headers
    > > exceed 65535. In particular, the program in 64-bit environment often
    > > demands more than 65535 mmaps. If you google max_map_count, then you
    > > can find many users facing this problem.
    > >
    > > Solaris has already dealt with this issue, and other OSes have also
    > > adopted the same method as in Solaris. Currently, Sun's document and
    > > AMD 64 ABI include the description for the extension, where they call
    > > the extension Extended Numbering. See Reference for further information.
    > >
    > > I believe that linux kernel should adopt the same way as they did, so
    > > I've written this patch.
    > >
    > > I am also preparing for patches of GDB and binutils.
    > That's a beautifully presented patchset. Thanks for doing all that
    > work - it helps.
    > UML maintenance appears to have ceased in recent times, so if we wish
    > to have these changes runtime tested (we should) then I think it would
    > be best if you could find someone to do that please.
    > And no akpm code-review would be complete without: dump_seek() is
    > waaaay to large to be inlined. Is there some common .c file to where
    > we could move it?

    I am sorry for very late reply.

    * Patch Test for UML-i386

    I tested on UML-i386 for the stable release of that time, precisely
    2.6.32, since even building process for UML-i386 failed for mainline
    and mmotm trees, as you've expected.

    I don't know internal UML implementation at all, so I need to find
    someone if runtime test for mmotm tree is absolutely necessary.

    * modification for dump_seek()

    I couldn't find any right .c file at which dump_seek() be placed. We
    need to create a new .c file into which we put auxiliary functions to
    generate/manipulate coredumps.

    There is another problem regarding name space. The name dump_seek() is
    too short. If we move dump_seek() to some .c file, we need to rename
    it according to the corresponding object file format, such as
    elf_core_dump_seek() or aout_dump_seek(); or coredump_dump_seek(), as
    currently dump_seek() is shared among dumping processes in multiple
    object formats.

    Should I submit these suggestions as a patch set of version 3?


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-01-12 04:15    [W:0.022 / U:1.672 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site