Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:11:36 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node |
| |
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:55:09 +1100 Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote:
> A number of places in the kernel use cpumask_of_node(-1), but most arch > NUMA implementations are broken. The following patches fix this. >
So.. what's happening here? Nobody has applied the patches anywhere, you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport was mentioned.
| |