lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 10:52 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
    > @@ -1502,7 +1502,8 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
    > */
    > if (sched_feat(LAST_BUDDY) && likely(se->on_rq && curr != rq->idle))
    > set_last_buddy(se);
    > - set_next_buddy(pse);
    > + if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY))
    > + set_next_buddy(pse);
    >
    > /*
    > * We can come here with TIF_NEED_RESCHED already set from new task

    You might want to test stuff like sysbench again, iirc we went on a
    cache-trashing rampage without buddies.

    Our goal is not to excel at any one load but to not suck at any one
    load.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-09 11:05    [W:0.020 / U:31.336 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site