Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:01:29 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][v5][PATCH 8/8]: Define clone_with_pids() syscall |
| |
On 09/09/2009 11:03 AM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > C90 or C99 below should work. Is it ok to use a data structure that is > not in C89 ? >
C89 is the same as C90 (C89 refers to the ANSI standard, C90 to the ISO standard, but they're functionally identical.)
> BTW, would it work if we defined > > struct pid_set { > u64 pids; > int num_pids; > } > > where ->pids can be still be a pointer ? The data structure would > have the same size on all architectures. >
It would rather suck in terms of usability, though.
-hpa
| |