lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Regarding dm-ioband tests
* Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp> [2009-09-08 12:01:19]:

> I think there are some advantages to dm-ioband. That's why I post
> dm-ioband to the mailing list.
>
> - dm-ioband supports not only proportional weight policy but also rate
> limiting policy. Besides, new policies can be added to dm-ioband if
> a user wants to control bandwidth by his or her own policy.
> - The dm-ioband driver can be replaced without stopping the system by
> using device-mapper's facility. It's easy to maintain.
> - dm-ioband can use without cgroup. (I remember Vivek said it's not an
> advantage.)

But don't you need page_cgroup for IO tracking?

--
Balbir


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-08 05:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site