[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:41:51 +0300
> >It shows similar curves and behavior to the 8-core results i posted
> >- BFS is slower than mainline in virtually every measurement. The
> >ratios are different for different parts of the graphs - but the
> >trend is similar.
> Dude, not cool.
> 1. Quad HT is not the same as a 4-core desktop, you're doing it with
> 8 cores

4 cores, 8 threads. Which is basically the standard desktop cpu going
forward... (4 cores already is today, 8 threads is that any day now)

Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-07 16:45    [W:0.192 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site