[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [quad core results] BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
    On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 16:41:51 +0300
    > >It shows similar curves and behavior to the 8-core results i posted
    > >- BFS is slower than mainline in virtually every measurement. The
    > >ratios are different for different parts of the graphs - but the
    > >trend is similar.
    > Dude, not cool.
    > 1. Quad HT is not the same as a 4-core desktop, you're doing it with
    > 8 cores

    4 cores, 8 threads. Which is basically the standard desktop cpu going
    forward... (4 cores already is today, 8 threads is that any day now)

    Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
    For development, discussion and tips for power savings,

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-07 16:45    [W:0.021 / U:16.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site