lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
    On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:38:36 +0300
    Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:

    > On 09/06/2009 11:59 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > >[...]
    > > Also, i'd like to outline that i agree with the general goals
    > > described by you in the BFS announcement - small desktop systems
    > > matter more than large systems. We find it critically important
    > > that the mainline Linux scheduler performs well on those systems
    > > too - and if you (or anyone else) can reproduce suboptimal behavior
    > > please let the scheduler folks know so that we can fix/improve it.
    >
    > BFS improved behavior of many applications on my Intel Core 2 box in
    > a way that can't be benchmarked. Examples:

    Have you tried to see if latencytop catches such latencies ?


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-07 16:39    [W:0.020 / U:16.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site