lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
    Date
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > So the testbox i picked fits into the upper portion of what i
    > consider a sane range of systems to tune for - and should still fit
    > into BFS's design bracket as well according to your description:
    > it's a dual quad core system with hyperthreading.

    Ingo,

    Nice that you've looked into this.

    Would it be possible for you to run the same tests on e.g. a dual core
    and/or a UP system (or maybe just offline some CPUs?)? It would be very
    interesting to see whether BFS does better in the lower portion of the
    range, or if the differences you show between the two schedulers are
    consistent across the range.

    Cheers,
    FJP


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-07 04:07    [W:0.021 / U:2.768 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site