[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So the testbox i picked fits into the upper portion of what i
> consider a sane range of systems to tune for - and should still fit
> into BFS's design bracket as well according to your description:
> it's a dual quad core system with hyperthreading.


Nice that you've looked into this.

Would it be possible for you to run the same tests on e.g. a dual core
and/or a UP system (or maybe just offline some CPUs?)? It would be very
interesting to see whether BFS does better in the lower portion of the
range, or if the differences you show between the two schedulers are
consistent across the range.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-07 04:07    [W:0.320 / U:1.860 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site