[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH tracing/kprobes 0/5] tracing/kprobes, perf: perf kprobe support

* Masami Hiramatsu <> wrote:

> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hi,
>> These patches introduce perf kprobe command and update kprobe-tracer.
>> perf kprobe command allows you to add new probe points by C line number
>> and local variable names.
> Last week, Arnaldo and I talked about this command, and he suggested
> that the command would be better 'perf probe', because it would be
> able to cover both of kernel space (by kprobes) and user space (by
> uprobes).


> Basically, I agree with his idea. But I think we may need to consider
> more flexible syntax for that purpose before we support uprobes. In
> this area, SystemTap has done big advance, we can see how many
> varieties of syntax it has by 'man stapprobes'.
> And also, it's hard to decide it without real uprobe-tracer (and
> uprobes too!) implementation on ftrace. So, I think it is better to
> continue using 'perf kprobe' in this time.
> But it's worth to add to todo list. :)

I'd still name it 'perf probe', even if initially it supports kprobes.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-30 14:07    [W:0.058 / U:39.316 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site