lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: disk speed regression kernel 2.6.29 and after
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:06:54 -0500
Will <whansard@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:08 AM, will <whansard@sbcglobal.net>
> > wrote:
> > > I had been using an old 2.6.22 kernel on my machine, and I often
> > > backup one partition of my main hard drive to a partition on a
> > > second hard drive. The main hard drive is sata 640 gigs, and the
> > > second is a pata 320 gig. copying this partition from one drive
> > > to the other with dd takes about 3 minutes and 30 seconds. When I
> > > installed kernel 2.6.30, and 2.6.31, the time took 9 minutes and
> > > 20 seconds. I decided to go to the trouble of compiling all the
> > > kernels between, and kernels 2.6.22-2.6.28 all do the operation
> > > in about 3
> >
>
> > > the drives
> > > with the kernels 2.6.29 and after.
> > > Please cc me with any followups or anything. thanks
>
> 295f00042aaf6b553b5f37348f89bab463d4a469 is first bad commit
> commit 295f00042aaf6b553b5f37348f89bab463d4a469
> Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri Jan 2 16:12:48 2009 +0100
>
> ide: don't execute the next queued command from the hard-IRQ
> context (v2)


if you're using CONFIG_IDE.... might be worth switching to the LIBATA
subsystem instead...


--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-24 11:13    [W:0.246 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site