lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: mailing list for trace users
From
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:40 PM, John Kacur <jkacur@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>>
>> * David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>>> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:47:25 +0200
>>>
>>> > Could you please also create the linux-perf-users list, for perf
>>> > events and the perf tool related user questions? (We have asked for
>>> > this before but must have gotten lost somewhere)
>>>
>>> I think your communities are similar enough and small enough that you
>>> could share this list.
>>
>> It's two separate subsystems. There's a lot of non-tracing aspects of
>> performance events: it does profiling, counting, latency analysis, etc.
>> The tool is named 'perf', the subsystem is named 'performance events',
>> and the most typical workflows dont do any tracing.
>>
>> And i beg to differ about the size of the communities. It's just been
>> added upstream...
>>
>> Also, what is the policy for adding new lists to vger.kernel.org? If a
>> subsystem maintainer asks for a list named after a core kernel
>> subsystem, how frequently is it rejected, and on what basis?
>>
>> I find it sad that such an arbitrary looking negative decision from you
>> forces a user list away from vger. I wouldnt mind it to be closed if it
>> has no significant traffic after a year or lifetime or so - many vger
>> lists have almost no traffic to begin with.
>>
>> Also, i cannot help but to observe the fact that you've fought the
>> original perfcounters project in a very ugly and public way less than a
>> year ago. Dont you think that you 'deciding' this matter in such a
>> negative fashion is a conflict of interest?
>>
>>        Ingo
>
> Yikes - Ingo, I don't want to spawn a long thread here about what to
> call the list, but
> as a native English speaker, I think that "linux-trace-users" sounds
> much nicer than
> "linux-tracing-users".
>
> Perhaps, trace is an adjective describing the kind of users, in any
> case, it doesn't
> sound like "one trace" - so, could we go this one?
> (if you insist on linux-tracing then you have to drop the word "users")
>
> John
>

That's funny, boast about my credentials as a native English speaker, and then
make a mistake.

s/go this one/go with this one
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-09-23 21:45    [W:0.686 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site