lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] blackfin: Cleanup linker script using new linker script macros.
    On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:39, Tim Abbott wrote:
    > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
    >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:29, Tim Abbott wrote:
    >> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
    >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 16:26, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    >> >> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:58:01AM -0400, Tim Abbott wrote:
    >> >> >> OK.  I guess we should plan to modify the INIT_DATA_SECTION macro to add
    >> >> >> another argument specifying an alignment level for .init.ramfs.  It'd be
    >> >> >> inconvenient to add that right now since there are a lot of patches in
    >> >> >> linux-next or otherwise in flight that introduce uses of
    >> >> >> INIT_DATA_SECTION, and those patches would all be broken by changing this
    >> >> >> now.  Once the dust settles on that for this release, I'll submit a patch
    >> >> >> adding said argument to INIT_DATA_SECTION.
    >> >> >
    >> >> > But this is all discarded during runtime so the added alignment has no cost in the end - no?
    >> >>
    >> >> once things are booted, there should be no difference.  but
    >> >> storage/boot costs increase (you have to store/extract/copy that extra
    >> >> data).  you know how miserly we embedded people like to be ;).
    >> >
    >> > OK, so how do you want to do this?  The options I see are:
    >> > (1) we merge this patch now, and add the new alignment argument for -rc2
    >> > (2) we add the alignment argument sometime after -rc1 and then merge this
    >> > for -rc2
    >>
    >> doing it in two steps is OK by me and sounds like it'd be easier for you
    >
    > Both options involve two steps -- but as (1) is obviously easier for me, I
    > assume that's what you were referring to.  Thanks.
    >
    > So are you going to send this to Linus?  I'd be happy to do so, but I'd
    > need your ack.

    if you apply the .text_l1 update (.init.ramfs -> .exit.data), then you
    can add my s-o-b. otherwise the original patch as posted is broken.
    -mike
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-22 17:49    [W:0.037 / U:0.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site