lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
    On Sun 2009-08-30 02:01:10, Christian Kujau wrote:
    > On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 at 09:51, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > > give system administrators. It's better than the fear-mongering
    > > > patches you had proposed earlier, but what would be better *still* is
    > > > telling people why running with degraded RAID arrays is bad, and to
    > > > give them further tips about how to use RAID arrays safely.
    > >
    > > Maybe this belongs to Doc*/filesystems, and more detailed RAID
    > > description should go to md description?
    >
    > Why should this be placed in *kernel* documentation anyway? The "dangers
    > of RAID", the hints that "backups are a good idea" - isn't that something
    > for howtos for sysadmins? No end-user will ever look into

    The fact that two kernel subsystems (MD RAID, journaling filesystems)
    do not work well together is surprising and should be documented near
    the source.
    Pavel
    --
    (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
    (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-09-02 22:59    [W:0.020 / U:32.572 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site